Subordinate clauses of secondary nominal positions


Иностранные языки, филология и лингвистика

Attributive clauses function as modifiers to a word of nominal character, which is generally called the antecedent. Usually an attributive clause immediately follows its antecedent, although some types may occasionally be distant



42 KB

6 чел.

39.Subordinate clauses of secondary nominal positions.

Clauses of secondary nominal positions

Attribute appositive clauses.

Attribute relative clauses

Attribute limiting (restrictive) clauses: particularizing and classifying.

Attribute non-limiting (non-restrictive) clauses: descriptive and continuative.

Attributive clauses function as modifiers to a word of nominal character, which is generally called the antecedent. Usually an attributive clause immediately follows its antecedent, although some types may occasionally be distant.

An attributive clause may be introduced by connectives  relative pronouns (who, whose, whom, what, which, that, as), or relative adverbs (when, where, whence, wherein). The choice of relative word depends on the categorical meaning of the antecedent.

a) If the antecedent denotes a living being, the relative pronoun who, whom, whose, or that is used.

A man whose voice seemed familiar to me gave commands.

Those of Big Lanny's friends who saw him for the first time had to be told that he couldn't see.

b) If the antecedent denotes a thing or notion, the relative word which, whose, or that is used; of these that is less formal.

At this remark, to which he did not reply, Gerald's ears grew hot.

He went to the next house, which stood in a small garden.

Clyde bowed and then took the cool hand that Myra extended to him.

c) If the antecedent is expressed by all denoting a living being the pronoun who or that is used; if it denotes a thing or notion only the pronoun that is generally used.

All that remained was to enter his name and send off the high entrance fees for the examination.

d) If the antecedent is expressed by everything, something, anything h nothing the relative pronoun that is generally used, or else the clause is joined asyndetically.

There was nothing in his face that spoke of his character.

Everything that you may want is in the wardrobe.

There was something in his low, languid voice that was absolutely fascinating.

e) If the antecedent is modified by the adjective only, the pronoun 'my, or by an adjective in the superlative degree, the attributive clause is introduced by the pronoun that or is joined asyndetically.

The only object that gave her satisfaction during those days was the white monkey.

This is the best chance that we have.

She could jump at any opportunity that she might have.

f) If the antecedent is modified by the demonstrative pronoun such, the relative pronoun as is used.

She was playing the piano with such feeling as couldn't he expected from a girl of her age.

g) After the antecedent modified by same, several relative expressions may be used:

the same children as..., the same person who..., the same island that..., the same time when..., the same place where..., etc.

h) Attributive clauses joined by the relative adverbs when, where, whence, whereon (rather obsolete) refer to antecedents designating spatial or temporal notions.

It is the hour when we sleep,

He turned to that huge globe whereon were marked all discoveries of the moment concerning the origin of modern Man...

i) The relative adverb why refers to antecedents denoting cause or reason.

They see no reason why they should not do so.

Types of attributive clauses

§ 158. Attributive clauses fall into two types, depending on the degree of connection and the relation they bear to the antecedent:

attributive limiting (restrictive) clauses and attributive descriptive (non-restrictive) clauses.

§ 159. Attributive limiting clauses are very closely connected with the antecedent and cannot be removed from the sentence, because the information contained in the attributive clause singles out, determines, or particularizes the person, thing, idea, etc., expressed by the antecedent. Therefore the meaning of the main clause is not complete or is altogether changed without the subordinate clause. The lack of completeness is manifested by some deictic elements (determinants) before the antecedent (mainly articles, demonstrative pronouns, or words with a demonstrative or particularizing meaning, such as the same, the only, the best}. The presence of such elements is justified only if the attributive clause is following. For example:

A library is a place where they keep books.

She had become aware of the fact that she was talking loudly.

In these sentences the main part taken separately is not clear because of the article which has a classifying (the first sentence) or a demonstrative force (the second sentence) and therefore requires some explanation in the form of an attributive clause or some context to make explicit what kind of place the library was, what fact was meant.

In some cases the dropping of the attributive clause does not make the main clause incomplete, but its meaning becomes altogether different from the meaning it has in the complex sentence. For example, compare the sentences:

a) Aren't you the young man who married Fleur Forsyte? (that particular man, Fleur Forsyte's husband)

b) Aren't you the young man? (that particular man known to the speaker and the listener, with no further information for the reader)

Limiting clauses may be joined by a connective with a preposition.! These are analogous to prepositional attributes.

Tins is the man about whom we spoke yesterday.

She inclined more and more to that peace and quietness of which

Montague Dartie had deprived her in her youth.

§ 160. Attributive clauses may be joined to the main clause without a relative word, that is, asyndetically. They are called contact clauses.

Contact clauses are always limiting, for both the main and the subordinate clause complete each other. Thus in the sentence The hum /J laid heard was the combined result of their whispered repetitions the clause 7 had heard makes no sense unless the antecedent hum in the main clause makes the meaning of the predicate had heard (and thus the clause itself) complete, though formally the word hum cannot be considered as the direct object of the predicate. Some more examples of the same kind:

He was a man one always forgot.

I know where she kept that packet she had.

I used to learn by heart the things they'd written.

This is the kind of job I’d like.

As can be seen from the above examples, contact clauses are possible only in eases where the antecedent is semantically acceptable in the position of a direct object, prepositional object, or of a predicative in the subordinate clause.

He was a man one always forgot  One always forgot such a man.

I used to learn by heart the things they'd written  They'd written things.

Sentences in which the main and the subordinate clauses have a common part which functions as the subject in the subordinate clause are used nowadays only in dialects and in fiction to give the narration local colour. These are called apokoinu sentences:

Perhaps it was his scars suggested it (his scars suggested it).

John's was the last name would have occurred to me (the last name would have occurred to me).

The next morning there was a boy came to see me (a boy came to see me),

§161. An attributive descriptive clause is characterized by a looser connection with the main clause. Usually it contains additional information about the antecedent and may be left out without any serious change in the meaning of the main clause. Attributive descriptive clauses are generally commad off. They are joined by the same connectives as limiting clauses, except the relative pronoun that, and asyndetic connection hardly ever occurs.

The additional descriptive character of the attributive clause is determined by the fact that the antecedent denotes a definite person, place, thing, notion, etc. It is either specified by a limiting attribute, or is expressed by a proper name, or else denotes a unique notion (or one specified by the situation).

At this age, which I judged to be near fifty, he 1оо1сЙ extremely young.

I returned to London, where I remained for a week.

I consulted my father, who promised to help me.

She was thinking how little the opening of this war - which had started that morning at five-eleven with the German army's marching into Poland - was like the opening of the last.

The supplementary status of the attributive clauses can be illustrated by the following, transformation of the first sentence given above.

At this age (and 1 judged him to be near fifty) he looked extremely young.

In formal English relative pronouns and adverbs introducing descriptive clauses may also occur in prepositional phrases opening the subordinate clause, for example: according to which, instead of which, in spite of which, on which, of which, to whom, since when, etc.; also within nominal phrases of the type: the largest part of which, each of which, many examples of which, during which time, which fact, etc. The relative pronoun approaches in its function the anaphoric demonstrative pronoun this, and the clause can be paraphrased by a coordinate or parenthetical clause. For example:

Then a breakfast was given in his honour, on which occasion many speeches were pronounced (and on this occasion many speeches were pronounced).

The medicine was overdosed, which fact caused the immediate death Л of the patient (and this fact caused the immediate death of the 'patient).

§ 162. An attributive descriptive clause referring to i whole clause, sentence, series of sentences, or even a whole story is called a continuative (or sentential) attributive clause. It is generally introduced by the connective which, occasionally by that.

When the attributive continuative clause refers to a sentence, it may be separated by a semicolon, a dash, or even by a full stop.

She lived in two rooms over a teashop, which was convenient, since she could send down for cakes and scones if she had visitors. (...что было удобно... поскольку...).

Several times he caught her looking at him with a hurt, puzzled expression, which pleased his evil mood (...что тешило его злобу).


А также другие работы, которые могут Вас заинтересовать

28895. Влияние природно-климатического, геополитического и религиозного факторов на российский исторический процесс 22 KB
  Важным географическим фактором определяющим особенности территории страны являются моря озера а также другие водоемы. Фундаментальные особенности ведения крестьянского хозяйства в конечном счете наложили неизгладимый отпечаток на русский национальный характер на первый взгляд противоречивый: способность к крайнему напряжению сил отсутствие ярко выраженной привычки к тщательности аккуратности в работе извечная тяга к подрайской землице необыкновенное чувство доброты коллективизма готовности к оказанию помощи вплоть до...
28896. Место средневековья во всемирно-историческом процессе 23.5 KB
  Место средневековья во всемирноисторическом процессе Понятие средний век было введено итальянскими гуманистами которые хотели таким образом подчеркнуть коренное отличие культуры своего времени от предшествующего исторического периода эпохи Античности. Как видно в оценке средневековья присутствуют крайности. Поразному определяются и временные рамки Средневековья. К тому же внутри тысячелетнего периода Средневековья принято выделять три этапа: Раннее Средневековье V в.
28897. Образование Древнерусского государства. Крещение Руси Х-Х11 в 30 KB
  Крещение Руси ХХ11 в. Расцвет Киевской Руси пришелся на правление князя Владимира 1 9801015 г. Это имело большое значение для дальнейшего развития Руси. Принятие христианства укрепляло государственную власть и территориальное единство Киевской Руси.
28898. Взаимоотношения Руси с соседними государствами и народами 22.5 KB
  Взаимоотношения Руси с соседними государствами и народами. Важное место занимали отношения с Византией которая являлась источником ресурсов для Руси. После крещения Руси Византия стала восприниматься как духовный центр христианства. Хазары контролировали Волжский торговый путь и выступали в двойной роли: с одной стороны препятствовали свободным торговым отношениям Руси; с другой выступали буфером между Русью и кочевниками.
28899. Удельный период в истории России (XII—XV вв.) 28.5 KB
  К середине XII века Русь раскололась на 15 княжеств которые были лишь в формальной зависимости от Киева. Феодальная раздробленность ослабляла Русь. В начальной стадии древнерусское государство распалось на 3 основные области: СевероЗападная Русь. Северовосточная Русь.
28900. Борьба за независимость русских земель против агрессии с Востока и Запада (XIII век) 27 KB
  Следствием этого явилось отставание России от Запада. Последствия нашествия: сократилось население страны; разделение городов подорвано городское ремесло; разрушены памятники духовенства и материальной культуры; особое последствие нашествия на истории России сказались в том что оно заложило азиатский способ власти в России.
28901. Культура Древнерусского государства 27.5 KB
  Достаточно продолжительное время на Руси сохранялось двоеверие что сыграло огромную роль в складывании культурного потенциала отражавшего в себе некую двойственность. Долгое время считалось что письмо на Руси появилось с принятием христианства. Но есть доказательства существования письменности задолго до этого: договоры Руси с Византией относящиеся к первой половине X века имели копии на славянском языке. Христианизация Руси просто дала толчок развитию письменности.
28902. Возвышение Москвы и завершение формирования Российского централизованного государства (XIV–XVI вв.) 29.5 KB
  Внешняя угроза ускоряла процесс объединения русских земель. Однако к середине XIV века складывается и другой центр объединения русских земель Великое ЛитовскоРусское княжество. На заключительном этапе объединения русских земель наиболее острой была борьба с Новгородской олигархической республикой. Этим в основном завершилось политическое объединение русских земель.
28903. Эпоха Ивана Грозного 28.5 KB
  Боярское правление привело к ослаблению центральной власти и вызвало большую волну недовольств и открытых выступлений. Страна нуждалась в реформах по укреплению государственности централизации власти. Во время царствования Ивана IV возник новый орган власти Земский собор который занимался решением важнейших государственных дел вопросами внешней политики финансами. Это достигалось вопервых усилием роли центральных органов приказов вовторых редким ограничением власти наместников.