Иностранные языки, филология и лингвистика

Morphology deals with paradigmatic and syntagmatic properties of morphological units – morphemes and words. It is concerned with the internal structure of words and their relationship to other words and word forms within the paradigm. It studies morphological categories and their realization.



37.5 KB

5 чел.


1.General characteristics of syntax.

The grammatical structure of language comprises two major parts – morphology and syntax. The two areas are obviously interdependent and together they constitute the study of grammar.

Morphology deals with paradigmatic and syntagmatic properties of morphological units – morphemes and words. It is concerned with the internal structure of words and their relationship to other words and word forms within the paradigm. It studies morphological categories and their realization.

Syntax, on the other hand, deals with the way words are combined. It is concerned with the external functions of words and their relationship to other words within the linearly ordered units – word-groups, sentences and texts. Syntax studies the way in which the units and their meanings are combined. It also deals with peculiarities of syntactic units, their behavior in different contexts.

Syntactic units may be analyzed from different points of view, and accordingly, different syntactic theories exist.

2. Kinds of syntactic theories.

Transformational-Generative Grammar. The Transformational grammar was first suggested by American scholar Zelling Harris as a method of analyzing sentences and was later elaborated by another American scholar Noam Chomsky as a synthetic method of ‘generating’ (constructing) sentences. The main point of the Transformational-Generative Grammar is that the endless variety of sentences in a language can be reduced to a finite number of kernels by means of transformations. These kernels serve the basis for generating sentences by means of syntactic processes. Different language analysts recognize the existence of different number of kernels (from 3 to 39). The following 6 kernels are commonly associated with the English language:

(1) NV – John sings. 

(2) NVAdj. – John is happy.

(3) NVN – John is a man.

(4) NVN – John hit the man.

(5) NVNN – John gave the man a book.

(6) NVPrep.N – The book is on the table.

It should be noted that (3) differs from (4) because the former admits no passive transformation.

Transformational method proves useful for analysing sentences from the point of their deep structure:

                           Flying planes can be dangerous.

This sentence is ambiguous, two senses can be distinguished: a) the action of flying planes can be dangerous, b) the planes that fly can be dangerous. Therefore it can be reduced to the following kernels:

a) Planes can be dangerous                         b)  Planes can be dangerous

  X (people) fly planes                                      Planes fly

Constructional Syntax. Constructional analysis of syntactic units was initiated by Prof. G.Pocheptsov in his book published in Kyiv in 1971. This analysis deals with the constructional significance/insignificance of a part of the sentence for the whole syntactic unit. The theory is based on the obligatory or optional environment of syntactic elements. For example, the element him in the sentence I saw him there yesterday is constructionally significant because it is impossible to omit it. At the same time the elements there and yesterday are constructionally insignificant – they can be omitted without destroying the whole structure.

Pragmatic approach to the study of syntactic units can briefly be described as the study of the way language is used in particular contexts to achieve particular goals. Speech Act Theory was first introduced by John Austin. The notion of a speech act presupposes that an utterance can be said with different intentions or purposes and therefore can influence the speaker and situation in different ways:

                                I just state the fact;

                                I want you to do something about it (close the window);

      It’s cold here     I’m threatening you;

                                I’m seeking for an excuse for not doing something;

                                I want you to feel guilty of it;                 


Accordingly, we can distinguish different speech acts.

Of special interest here is the problem of indirect speech acts: Are you leaving already? In our everyday activities we use indirect speech acts rather willingly because it is the best way to influence people, to get what we want and to be polite at the same time.

3. Basic syntactic notions.

The syntactic language level can be described with the help of special linguistic terms and notions: syntactic unit, syntactic form, syntactic meaning, syntactic function, syntactic position, and syntactic relations. 

Syntactic unit is always a combination that has at least two constituents. The basic syntactic units are a word-group, a clause, a sentence, and a text. Their main features are:

  1.  they are hierarchical units – the units of a lower level serve the building material for the units of a higher level;
  2.  as all language units the syntactic units are of two-fold nature:

                                 content side         syntactic meaning

     Syntactic unit  =                       =                                                       

                                expression side     syntactic form          

c)  they are of communicative and non-communicative nature – word-groups            

    and clauses are of non-communicative nature while sentences and texts

    are of communicative nature.

Syntactic meaning is the way in which separate word meanings are combined to produce meaningful word-groups and sentences.

Green ideas sleep furiously. This sentence is quite correct grammatically. However it makes no sense as it lacks syntactic meaning.

Syntactic form may be described as the distributional formula of the unit (pattern). John hits the ball – N1 + V + N2.

Syntactic function is the function of a unit on the basis of which it is included to a larger unit: in the word-group a smart student the word ‘smart’ is in subordinate attributive relations to the head element. In traditional terms it is used to denote syntactic function of a unit within the sentence (subject, predicate, etc.).

Syntactic position is the position of an element. The order of constituents in syntactic units is of principal importance in analytical languages. The syntactic position of an element may determine its relationship with the other elements of the same unit: his broad back, a back district, to go back, to back sm.

Syntactic relations are syntagmatic relations observed between syntactic units. They can be of three types – coordination, subordination and predication.

  1.  Syntactic relations.

The syntactic units can go into three types of syntactic relations.

  1.  Coordination (SR1) – syntagmatic relations of independence. SR1 can be observed on the phrase, sentence and text levels. Coordination may be symmetric and asymmetric. Symmetric coordination is characterized by complete interchangeability of its elements – pens and pencils. Asymmetric coordination occurs when the position of elements is fixed: ladies and gentlemen. Forms of connection within SR1 may be copulative (you and me), disjunctive (you or me), adversative (strict but just) and causative-consecutive (sentence and text level only).
  2.  Subordination (SR2) – syntagmatic relations of dependence. SR2 are established between the constituents of different linguistic rank. They are observed on the phrase and sentence level. Subordination may be of three different kinds – adverbial (to speak slowly), objective (to see a house) and attributive (a beautiful flower). Forms of subordination may also be different – agreement (this book – these books), government (help us), adjournment (the use of modifying particles just, only, even, etc.) and enclosure (the use of modal words and their equivalents really, after all, etc.).
  3.  Predication (SR3) – syntagmatic relations of interdependence. Predication may be of two kinds – primary (sentence level) and secondary (phrase level). Primary predication is observed between the subject and the predicate of the sentence while secondary predication is observed between non-finite forms of the verb and nominal elements within the sentence. Secondary predication serves the basis for gerundial, infinitive and participial word-groups (predicative complexes).



А также другие работы, которые могут Вас заинтересовать

50033. Перевірка правил Кірхгофа 133.5 KB
  Мета роботи: перевірити правила Кірхгофа для кола постійного струму. Теоретичні пояснення правил Кірхгофа а також їх практичне використання для розрахунку розгалужених електричних кіл показані в розділі 3. Застосуємо перше правило Кірхгофа до вузла В...
  Как следствие фокусное расстояние объектива зависит от длины световой волны и если для одной длины волны изображение хорошо сфокусировано то для других длин волн хорошей фокусировки не наблюдается. Если как это обычно бывает оправа объектива круглая то изображение светящейся точки имеет вид круглого пятна окруженного концентрическими светлыми и темными кольцами рис. Способность объектива создавать раздельные изображения близко расположенных мелких деталей называется разрешающей способностью объектива. Чем меньше угол  тем ближе...
50035. Юридическая психология. Учебно-методический комплекс 677.5 KB
  Цель дисциплины – психологическая подготовка юриста к профессиональной деятельности, формирование эффективных приемов работы с людьми и овладение методами профессионально значимого самопознания и саморазвития личности.
  Приводятся величины предельно допустимых концентраций ПДК вредных газов выше которых следует применять средства защиты: респираторы с противогазовыми патронами если концентрация вредного газа не превышает 10 ПДК или противогазы если концентрация вредного газа в воздухе выше 10 ПДК. ИЗУЧЕНИЕ И ВЫБОР СРЕДСТВ ИНДИВИДУАЛЬНОЙ ЗАЩИТЫ ОРГАНОВ ДЫХАНИЯ Цель работы: Изучить назначение устройство и область применения средств индивидуальной защиты органов дыхания СИЗОД. Порядок выбора СИЗОД их классификация и требования к применению...
  Кольца Ньютона. Классическим примером полос равной толщины являются кольца Ньютона. 1а видно что толщина воздушного зазора δ связана с радиусами наблюдаемых колец rk и радиусом кривизны линзы R следующим образом: 2 Учтем что δ R2 1 и пренебрегая этим слагаемым в формуле 2 получим: 3 С учетом 3 выражение 1 будет иметь вид: 4 Интерференционные максимумы светлые кольца получаются при условии если на разности хода укладывается четное число полуволн целое число длин волн: 5 где k = 0 1 2. порядок интерференции или...